Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
A Robotic Assistance Personalization Control Approach of Hip Exoskeletons for Gait Symmetry Improvement | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

A Robotic Assistance Personalization Control Approach of Hip Exoskeletons for Gait Symmetry Improvement


Abstract:

Healthy human locomotion functions with good gait symmetry depend on rhythmic coordination of the left and right legs, which can be deteriorated by neurological disorders...Show More

Abstract:

Healthy human locomotion functions with good gait symmetry depend on rhythmic coordination of the left and right legs, which can be deteriorated by neurological disorders like stroke and spinal cord injury. Powered exoskeletons are promising devices to improve impaired people's locomotion functions, like gait symmetry. However, given higher uncertainties and the time-varying nature of human-robot interaction, providing personalized robotic assistance from exoskeletons to achieve the best gait symmetry is challenging, especially for people with neurological disorders. In this paper, we propose a hierarchical control framework for a bilateral hip exoskeleton to provide the adaptive optimal hip joint assistance with a control objective of imposing the desired gait symmetry during walking. Three control levels are included in the hierarchical framework, including the high-level control to tune three control parameters based on a policy iteration reinforcement learning approach, the middle-level control to define the desired assistive torque profile based on a delayed output feedback control method, and the low-level control to achieve a good torque trajectory tracking performance. To evaluate the feasibility of the proposed control framework, five healthy young participants are recruited for treadmill walking experiments, where an artificial gait asymmetry is imitated as the hemiparesis post-stroke, and only the ‘paretic’ hip joint is controlled with the proposed framework. The pilot experimental studies demonstrate that the hierarchical control framework for the hip exoskeleton successfully (asymmetry index from 8.8% to − 0.5%) and efficiently (less than 4 minutes) achieved the desired gait symmetry by providing adaptive optimal assistance on the ‘paretic’ hip joint.
Date of Conference: 01-05 October 2023
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 13 December 2023
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Detroit, MI, USA

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Over the last two decades, there has been a flurry of research efforts in developing wearable lower-limb exoskeletons to augment functions for healthy individuals [1], [2] or provide rehabilitation/assistance for individuals with motor deficits [3], [4]. Focusing on the hip joint, various powered joint configurations, actuator designs, and control techniques have been reported to assist gait rehabilitation and human performance augmentation [5]–[9]. The rising research interest on hip exoskeletons lies in 1) the hip is important for powering upright locomotion and postural control [10], 2) the hip joint is capable of manipulating step length, step width, and associated gait symmetry during walking, 3) compared with the ankle joint, the hip joint needs higher metabolic cost for the generation of similar mechanical joint power owing to the differences in muscle characteristics [11], and 4) compared with ankle/knee exoskeletons, hip exoskeletons add less mass to the leg, altering the leg dynamics to a lesser degree. Typically, individuals with neurological disorders caused by diseases or injuries such as a stroke and spinal cord injury generally have muscle weakness, which could lead to insufficient force or torque at the hip joints during locomotion [12], which easily causes gait asymmetry, increase metabolic cost, and poor balance control [13] that deteriorate activities of daily living. Therefore, improving gait symmetry is significant for individuals with neurological impairments.

Select All
1.
A. B. Zoss, H. Kazerooni and A. Chu, "Biomechanical design of the berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (bleex)", IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 128-138, 2006.
2.
M. P. De Looze, T. Bosch, F. Krause, K. S. Stadler and L. W. O'sullivan, "Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load", Ergonomics, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 671-681, 2016.
3.
J. L. Pons, "Rehabilitation exoskeletal robotics", IEEE eng. med. biol. mag., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 57-63, 2010.
4.
D. Shi, W. Zhang, W. Zhang and X. Ding, "A review on lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots", Chin. J. Mech. Eng., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2019.
5.
W. Huo, S. Mohammed, J. C. Moreno and Y. Amirat, "Lower limb wearable robots for assistance and rehabilitation: A state of the art", IEEE Syst. J., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1068-1081, 2014.
6.
T. Yan, M. Cempini, C. M. Oddo and N. Vitiello, "Review of assistive strategies in powered lower-limb orthoses and exoskeletons", Robot. Auton. Syst., vol. 64, pp. 120-136, 2015.
7.
A. J. Young and D. P. Ferris, "State of the art and future directions for lower limb robotic exoskeletons", IEEE Trans. Neural Sys. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 171-182, 2017.
8.
B. Chen, B. Zi, L. Qin and Q. Pan, "State-of-the-art research in robotic hip exoskeletons: A general review", J. Orthop. Translat., vol. 20, pp. 4-13, 2020.
9.
A. Rodríguez-Fernández, J. Lobo-Prat and J. M. Font-Llagunes, "Systematic review on wearable lower-limb exoskeletons for gait training in neuromuscular impairments", J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2021.
10.
D. J. Farris and G. S. Sawicki, "The mechanics and energetics of human walking and running: a joint level perspective", J. R. Soc. Interface., vol. 9, no. 66, pp. 110-118, 2012.
11.
B. R. Umberger and J. Rubenson, "Understanding muscle energetics in locomotion: new modeling and experimental approaches", Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 59-67, 2011.
12.
S. J. Olney and C. Richards, "Hemiparetic gait following stroke. part i: Characteristics", Gait & posture, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 136-148, 1996.
13.
L. N. Awad, J. Bae, K. O'donnell, S. M. De Rossi, K. Hendron, L. H. Sloot, P. Kudzia, S. Allen, K. G. Holt, T. D. Ellis et al., "A soft robotic exosuit improves walking in patients after stroke", Sci. Transl. Med., vol. 9, no. 400, pp. eaai9084, 2017.
14.
K. Suzuki, G. Mito, H. Kawamoto, Y. Hasegawa and Y. Sankai, "Intention-based walking support for paraplegia patients with robot suit hal", Adv. Robot., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1441-1469, 2007.
15.
R. Farris, H. Quintero and M. Goldfarb, "Preliminary evaluation of a powered lower limb orthosis to aid walking in paraplegic individuals", IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 652-659, 2011.
16.
S. A. Murray, K. H. Ha, C. Hartigan and M. Goldfarb, "An assistive control approach for a lower-limb exoskeleton to facilitate recovery of walking following stroke", IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 441-449, 2014.
17.
J. Li, B. Shen, C.-M. Chew, C. L. Teo and A. N. Poo, "Novel functional task-based gait assistance control of lower extremity assistive device for level walking", IIEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 1096-1106, 2015.
18.
D. Zanotto, P. Stegall and S. K. Agrawal, "Adaptive assist-as-needed controller to improve gait symmetry in robot-assisted gait training", IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp. 724-729, 2014.
19.
K. Seo, J. Lee, Y. Lee, T. Ha and Y. Shim, "Fully autonomous hip exoskeleton saves metabolic cost of walking", IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4628-4635, 2016.
20.
G. Aguirre-Ollinger, A. Narayan and H. Yu, "Phase-synchronized assistive torque control for the correction of kinematic anomalies in the gait cycle", IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2305-2314, 2019.
21.
Y. Qian, H. Yu and C. Fu, "Adaptive oscillator-based assistive torque control for gait asymmetry correction with a nsea-driven hip exoskeleton", IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 30, pp. 2906-2915, 2022.
22.
B. Lim, J. Lee, J. Jang, K. Kim, Y. J. Park, K. Seo, et al., "Delayed output feedback control for gait assistance with a robotic hip exoskeleton", IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1055-1062, 2019.
23.
S. Mulroy, J. Gronley, W. Weiss, C. Newsam and J. Perry, "Use of cluster analysis for gait pattern classification of patients in the early and late recovery phases following stroke", Gait & posture, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 114-125, 2003.
24.
G. Kwakkel, B. Kollen and E. Lindeman, "Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories", Restor. Neurol. Neurosci., vol. 22, no. 3–5, pp. 281-299, 2004.
25.
D. Gopinath, S. Jain and B. D. Argall, "Human-in-the-loop optimization of shared autonomy in assistive robotics", IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 247-254, 2016.
26.
J. R. Koller, D. H. Gates, D. P. Ferris and C. D. Remy, "‘body-in-the-loop’ optimization of assistive robotic devices: A validation study", Robotics: Science and Systems, vol. 2016, pp. 1-10, 2016.
27.
M. Kim, Y. Ding, P. Malcolm, J. Speeckaert, C. J. Siviy, C. J. Walsh, et al., "Human-in-the-loop bayesian optimization of wearable device parameters", PloS one, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. e0184054, 2017.
28.
J. Zhang, P. Fiers, K. A. Witte, R. W. Jackson, K. L. Poggensee, C. G. Atkeson, et al., "Human-in-the-loop optimization of exoskeleton assistance during walking", Science, vol. 356, no. 6344, pp. 1280-1284, 2017.
29.
Y. Ding, M. Kim, S. Kuindersma and C. J. Walsh, "Human-in-the-loop optimization of hip assistance with a soft exosuit during walking", Sci. Robot., vol. 3, no. 15, pp. eaar5438, 2018.
30.
J. Kim, G. Lee, R. Heimgartner, D. A. Revi, N. Karavas, D. Nathanson, I. Galiana, A. Eckert-Erdheim, P. Murphy, D. Perry et al., "Reducing the metabolic rate of walking and running with a versatile portable exosuit", Science, vol. 365, no. 6454, pp. 668-672, 2019.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.