Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Sample Point Classification of Abdominal ECG Through CNN-Transformer Model Enables Efficient Fetal Heart Rate Detection | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Sample Point Classification of Abdominal ECG Through CNN-Transformer Model Enables Efficient Fetal Heart Rate Detection


Abstract:

Monitoring fetal heart rate (FHR) is essential for the early detection of fetal distress and ensuring safe delivery. Direct invasive fetal electrocardiography (FECG) prov...Show More

Abstract:

Monitoring fetal heart rate (FHR) is essential for the early detection of fetal distress and ensuring safe delivery. Direct invasive fetal electrocardiography (FECG) provides reliable FHR signals but is limited to use during labor. Noninvasive fetal heart monitoring can be achieved through abdominal electrocardiography (AECG), where fetal heartbeat waveforms are captured from electrodes placed on maternal abdomen. However, accurately locating fetal R-peaks and obtaining FHRs remain challenging due to interference from uterine contractions and maternal heartbeats. To address this challenge, we proposed an end-to-end fetal R-peak detection method based on sample point classification. Inspired by semantic segmentation in image analysis, we utilized an encoder-decoder model to classify each point in the 1-D AECG signal. The model captures the global contextual information of fetal heartbeat waveforms by combining convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer, resulting in a high-precision classification of each sample point in the AECG signal. Moreover, to mitigate the impact of misclassified points on fetal R-peak detection, we proposed a postprocessing method based on the periodicity of heartbeats. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated on two AECG databases, achieving satisfactory results with an average F1-score of 98.91%. These findings demonstrate the potential application of long-term fetal monitoring using portable devices. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/ZJUT-CBS/FR-Net.
Article Sequence Number: 6500412
Date of Publication: 01 December 2023

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Stillbirth refers to the death of a fetus after 24 weeks of gestation, affecting around 2.5 million infants worldwide each year [1]. Fetal heart rate (FHR) is a crucial indicator used to assess fetal well-being and monitor fetal condition during pregnancy. Accurate assessment of FHR is of paramount importance in the timely detection of hypoxia, intrauterine distress, and other fetal conditions [2]. Traditionally, ultrasonic cardiotocography (CTG) has been the primary technique employed in clinical practice to obtain FHR. However, CTG provides only time-averaged FHR and lacks detailed information on heart rate variability [3]. Moreover, the absolute safety of the fetus cannot be guaranteed in ultrasound radio frequency exposure [4].

Select All
1.
Z. A. Bhutta et al., "Stillbirths: What difference can we make and at what cost?", Lancet, vol. 377, no. 9776, pp. 1523-1538, Apr. 2011.
2.
M. Tarvonen, S. Sainio, E. Hämäläinen, V. Hiilesmaa, S. Andersson and K. Teramo, "Saltatory pattern of fetal heart rate during labor is a sign of fetal hypoxia", Neonatology, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 111-117, 2020.
3.
R. Kahankova et al., "A review of signal processing techniques for non-invasive fetal electrocardiography", IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 13, pp. 51-73, 2020.
4.
P. Hamelmann et al., "Doppler ultrasound technology for fetal heart rate monitoring: A review", IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 226-238, Feb. 2020.
5.
V. Zarzoso and A. K. Nandi, "Noninvasive fetal electrocardiogram extraction: Blind separation versus adaptive noise cancellation", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 12-18, Jan. 2001.
6.
F. Andreotti, F. Gräßer, H. Malberg and S. Zaunseder, "Non-invasive fetal ECG signal quality assessment for multichannel heart rate estimation", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 2793-2802, Dec. 2017.
7.
L. Xu et al., "Simulator of a full fetal electrocardiogram measurement chain by multichannel capacitive sensing", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 4348-4357, Jul. 2020.
8.
A. Galli, E. Peri, C. Rabotti, S. Ouzounov and M. Mischi, "Automatic optimization of multichannel electrode configurations for robust fetal heart rate detection by blind source separation", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1196-1207, Apr. 2023.
9.
F. Andreotti et al., "Robust fetal ECG extraction and detection from abdominal leads", Physiolog. Meas., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1551-1567, Aug. 2014.
10.
Y. Zhang and S. Yu, "Single-lead noninvasive fetal ECG extraction by means of combining clustering and principal components analysis", Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 419-432, Feb. 2020.
11.
X. Wang et al., " PA 2 Net: Period-aware attention network for robust fetal ECG detection ", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 71, pp. 1-12, 2022.
12.
W. Zhong and W. Zhao, "Fetal ECG extraction using short time Fourier transform and generative adversarial networks", Physiolog. Meas., vol. 42, no. 10, Oct. 2021.
13.
M. R. Mohebbian, S. S. Vedaei, K. A. Wahid, A. Dinh, H. R. Marateb and K. Tavakolian, "Fetal ECG extraction from maternal ECG using attention-based CycleGAN", IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informat., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 515-526, Feb. 2022.
14.
A. Shokouhmand and N. Tavassolian, "Fetal electrocardiogram extraction using dual-path source separation of single-channel non-invasive abdominal recordings", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 283-295, Jan. 2023.
15.
X. Wang, Z. He, Z. Lin, Y. Han, W. Su and S. Xie, "Correlation-aware attention CycleGAN for accurate fetal ECG extraction", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 72, pp. 1-13, 2023.
16.
A. N. Wu, R. Stouffs and F. Biljecki, "Generative adversarial networks in the built environment: A comprehensive review of the application of GANs across data types and scales", Building Environ., vol. 223, Sep. 2022.
17.
W. Zhong, L. Liao, X. Guo and G. Wang, "Fetal electrocardiography extraction with residual convolutional encoder–decoder networks", Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1081-1089, Dec. 2019.
18.
K. J. Lee and B. Lee, "End-to-end deep learning architecture for separating maternal and fetal ECGs using W-Net", IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 39782-39788, 2022.
19.
A. Rahman et al., "Fetal ECG extraction from maternal ECG using deeply supervised LinkNet++ model", Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 123, Aug. 2023.
20.
X. Wang, Y. Han and Y. Deng, "ASW-Net: Adaptive spectral wavelet network for accurate fetal ECG extraction", IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1387-1396, Dec. 2022.
21.
M. Almadani, L. Hadjileontiadis and A. Khandoker, "One-dimensional W-NETR for non-invasive single channel fetal ECG extraction", IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informat., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 3198-3209, Apr. 2023.
22.
A. Vaswani et al., "Attention is all you need", Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 30, pp. 1-15, 2017.
23.
L. Yang, Y. Gu, G. Bian and Y. Liu, "TMF-Net: A transformer-based multiscale fusion network for surgical instrument segmentation from endoscopic images", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 72, pp. 1-15, 2023.
24.
J. von der Mosel, A. Trautsch and S. Herbold, "On the validity of pre-trained transformers for natural language processing in the software engineering domain", IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1487-1507, Apr. 2023.
25.
C. Li et al., "TFFormer: A time–frequency information fusion-based CNN-transformer model for OSA detection with single-lead ECG", IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 72, pp. 1-17, 2023.
26.
J. Jezewski, A. Matonia, T. Kupka, D. Roj and R. Czabanski, "Determination of fetal heart rate from abdominal signals: Evaluation of beat-to-beat accuracy in relation to the direct fetal electrocardiogram", Biomedizinische Technik/Biomed. Eng., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 383-394, Jan. 2012.
27.
A. L. Goldberger et al., "PhysioBank PhysioToolkit and PhysioNet: Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals", Circulation, vol. 101, no. 23, pp. e215-e220, Jun. 2000.
28.
A. Matonia et al., "Fetal electrocardiograms direct and abdominal with reference heartbeat annotations", Sci. Data, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 200, Jun. 2020.
29.
"A review of fetal ECG signal processing issues and promising directions", Open Pacing Electrophysiol. Therapy J., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1-30, 2010.
30.
L. Qiao, S. Hu, B. Xiao, X. Bi, W. Li and X. Gao, "A dual self-calibrating framework for non-invasive fetal ECG R-peak detection", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 18, pp. 16579-16593, Apr. 2023.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.