Loading web-font TeX/Main/Regular
A Combination of Feature Extraction and Feedforward Neural Network to Estimate Muscle Activity in Human Gait | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

A Combination of Feature Extraction and Feedforward Neural Network to Estimate Muscle Activity in Human Gait


Abstract:

Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) has been widely recognized to be the practical alternative to capture and analyze human gait. However, due to its inherent characteristics...Show More

Abstract:

Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) has been widely recognized to be the practical alternative to capture and analyze human gait. However, due to its inherent characteristics, it can only measure the basic kinematics of the body segment it attached to. With the help of the machine learning, IMU can be used to determine the dynamic behavior of the major lower extremity muscle. This paper explores the use of feature-extracted IMU data and a neural network to estimate muscle activity during walking. IMU and Electromyogram (EMG) data were collected from fifty-eight healthy participants. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Tsfresh (Time Series FeatuRe Extraction on basis of Scalable Hypothesis tests) were applied to extract the relevant features from the data. These features were then used to train the Feedforward Neural Network (FNN). A combination of Tsfresh and FNN yielded the best results with correlation coefficient (r) of 95.73% and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 11.20%. This research can potentially help reduce the number of sensors needed in gait analysis, allow for portable motion capture, and improve the accuracy and efficiency of the FNN model in estimating muscle activity.
Date of Conference: 31 October 2023 - 03 November 2023
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 22 November 2023
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Chiang Mai, Thailand
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The application of wearable sensors, such as Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) has gained significant traction in the human movement analysis. This sensor provides critical information about the body motion in various activities, including walking. Typical walking gait analysis involves the use of optical motion capture system, force plate and Electromyogram (EMG). However, these systems are bulky and require elaborate setup. Thus, performing gait analysis outside of the clinical or laboratory setting is difficult.

Select All
1.
L. C. Benson, A. M. Raisanen, C. A. Clermont and R. Ferber, "Is This the Real Life or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis", Sensors, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1722, 2022.
2.
C. Monoli, J. F. Fuentez-Perez, N. Cau, P. Capodaglio, M. Galli and J. A. Tuhtan, "Land and Underwater Gait Analysis Using Wearable IMU", IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 11192-11202, 2021.
3.
M. Sharifi Renani, A. M. Eustace, C. A. Myers and C. W. Clary, "The Use of Synthetic IMU Signals in the Training of Deep Learning Models Significantly Improves the Accuracy of Joint Kinematic Predictions", Sensors, vol. 21, no. 17, pp. 5876, 2021.
4.
M. Blazkiewicz and A. Wit, "Artificial neural network simulation of lower limb joint angles in normal and impaired human gait", Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 43-49, 2018.
5.
M. Khant, D. Gouwanda, A. A. Gopalai, K. H. Lim and C. C. Foong, "Estimation of Lower Extremity Muscle Activity in Gait Using the Wearable Inertial Measurement Units and Neural Network", Sensors, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 556, 2023.
6.
U. Trinler, F. Leboeuf, K. Hollands, R. Jones and R. Baker, "Estimation of muscle activation during different walking speeds with two mathematical approaches compared to surface EMG", Gait & posture, vol. 64, pp. 266-273, 2018.
7.
E. V. Zabre-Gonzalez, D. Amieva-Alvarado and S. A. Beardsley, "Prediction of EMG activation profiles from gait kinematics and kinetics during multiple terrains", 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 6326-6329, 2021.
8.
N. F. Troje, "Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns", Journal of Vision, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 2-2, 2002.
9.
A. Daffertshofer, C. J. C. Lamoth, O. G. Meijer and P. J. Beek, "PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial", Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 415-428, 2004.
10.
L. Van, Der Maaten, E. Postma and J. Van Den Herik, "Dimensionality reduction: a comparative", J Mach Learn Res, vol. 10, no. 66–71, pp. 13, 2009.
11.
J. Khodr and R. Younes, "Dimensionality reduction on hyperspectral images: A comparative review based on artificial datas", 2011 4th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, vol. 4, pp. 15-17, Oct. 2011.
12.
M. Gavrilovic and D. B. Popovic, "A principal component analysis (PCA) based assessment of the gait performance", Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 449-457, 2021.
13.
J. W. Seo et al., "Principal Characteristics of Affected and Unaffected Side Trunk Movement and Gait Event Parameters during Hemiplegic Stroke Gait with IMU Sensor", Sensors (Basel), vol. 20, no. 24, Dec 2020.
14.
M. Christ, N. Braun, J. Neuffer and A. W. Kempa-Liehr, "Time Series FeatuRe Extraction on basis of Scalable Hypothesis tests (tsfresh - A Python package)", Neurocomputing, vol. 307, pp. 72-77, 2018.
15.
S. M. Moghadam, T. Yeung and J. Choisne, "A comparison of machine learning models' accuracy in predicting lower-limb joints' kinematics kinetics and muscle forces from wearable sensors", Scientific Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 5046, 2023.
16.
S. Luqian and Z. Yuyuan, "Human Activity Recognition Using Time Series Pattern Recognition Model-Based on Tsfresh Features", 2021 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), pp. 1035-1040, June 2021.
17.
N. Kala, T. Bhatia and N. Aggarwal, "Person Identification and Characterization from Gait Using Smartphone", 2019 11th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS), pp. 492-495, Jan. 2019.
18.
S. Arita, D. Nishiyama, T. Taniguchi, D. Fukui, M. Yamanaka and H. Yamada, "Feature selection to classify lameness using a smartphone-based inertial measurement unit", PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. e0258067, 2021.
19.
"SENIAM recommendations for determination of sensor location", SENIAM, [online] Available: http://seniam.org/.
20.
J. J. Banks, W.-R. Chang, X. Xu and C.-C. Chang, "Using horizontal heel displacement to identify heel strike instants in normal gait", Gait & Posture, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 101-103, 2015.
21.
I. T. J. Cadima and Jorge, "Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments", review-article 2016–4-13, 2016.
22.
J. Lever, M. Krzywinski and N. Altman, "Principal component analysis", Nature Methods, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 641-642, 2017.
23.
J. Korstanje, "The Random Forest" in Advanced Forecasting with Python: With State-of-the-Art-Models Including LSTMs Facebook's Prophet and Amazon's DeepAR, Berkeley, CA:Apress, pp. 179-191, 2021.
24.
"Principle component analysis of multivariate time series", Multivariate Time Series Analysis and Applications, pp. 139-161, 2019.
25.
Y.-W. Kim, K.-L. Joa, H.-Y. Jeong and S. Lee, "Wearable IMU-Based Human Activity Recognition Algorithm for Clinical Balance Assessment Using 1D-CNN and GRU Ensemble Model", Sensors (Basel Switzerland), vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 7628, 2021.
26.
J. M. Adams and K. Cerny, Observational Gait Analysis: A Visual Guide, Thorofare: Thorofare:SLACK, Incorporated, 2018.
27.
A. Schmitz, A. Silder, B. Heiderscheit, J. Mahoney and D. G. Thelen, "Differences in lower-extremity muscular activation during walking between healthy older and young adults", Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1085-1091.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.