Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Prediction of Surface Roughness of a Nimonic C-238 by Using the ANN Technique | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Prediction of Surface Roughness of a Nimonic C-238 by Using the ANN Technique


Abstract:

Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach is employed to forecast surface roughness (Ra)in the turning of Nimonic C238 using cutting parameters such as Feed, Speed, and De...Show More

Abstract:

Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach is employed to forecast surface roughness (Ra)in the turning of Nimonic C238 using cutting parameters such as Feed, Speed, and Depth of cut. Experiments using carbide inserts were carried out, and the outcomes of these experiments were measured. The measured responses were fed into an ANN, which was then trained to predict the surface roughness. It has been discovered that ANN models provide better surface roughness (Ra) predictions than mechanical assessment techniques. Furthermore, the outcomes of ANN predictions are compared to the surface roughness (Ra)value obtained through experiments. Finally, it was established that the stylus measuring technique is less accurate than ANN models in determining surface roughness. These forecasts are useful for real-time operation control, which is required to obtain the required surface roughness. The created ANN approach can accurately estimate the Surface roughness (Ra)value of the Surface roughness (Ra)with an error percentage of less than 3.45%.
Date of Conference: 20-22 September 2023
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 16 October 2023
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Trichy, India
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

When it comes to the process of machining Nimonic C238, a correct prediction of the surface roughness is of the utmost importance. This is done to ensure that the machined components will have the required quality and performance. Nimonic C238, a high-performance nickel-based superalloy, is put to use in a variety of industries due to the remarkable mechanical qualities and heat resistance that it possesses. These industries include aerospace, power generation, and others. The machining of Nimonic C238 is difficult due to the material's high hardness, low thermal conductivity, and strong inclination to work harden. [1] These characteristics make the material difficult to work with. Historically, the prediction of surface roughness in machining operations has relied on empirical models that were developed from a large number of comprehensive experimental trials. However, these methods frequently have shortcomings, particularly when it comes to effectively capturing the intricate interactions that exist between the parameters of the machining process and the surface roughness. The application of Artificial Neural Networks, often known as ANN s, has emerged as a potentially useful method for overcoming these limitations[2].

Select All
1.
S. Lakshmana Kumar, V. Jacintha, A. Mahendran, R. M. Bommi, M. Nagaraj and U. Kandasamy, "A Machine Learning Approach to Optimize Model and Predict the Machining Factors in Dry Drilling of Nimonic C263", Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2022, pp. 1-11, 2022.
2.
C. Ezilarasan, V. S. S. Kumar, A. Velayudham and K. Palanikumar, "Surface roughness analysis on machining of nimonic C-263 alloy using ANN and RSM techniques", Int. J. Precis. Technol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 340, 2011.
3.
A. Kosarac, C. Mladjenovic, M. Zeljkovic, S. Tabakovic and M. Knezev, "Neural-Network-Based Approaches for Optimization of Machining Parameters Using Small Dataset", Materials (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 3, 2022.
4.
V. D. Ganesh and R. M. Bommi, "Materials Today: Proceedings Cutting force and surface roughness measurement in turning of Monel K 500 using GRA method", Mater. Today Proc., no. xxxx, 2023.
5.
H. Peksen and A. Kalyon, "Optimization and measurement of flank wear and surface roughness via Taguchi based grey relational analysis", Mater. Manuf. Process., vol. 36, no. 16, pp. 1865-1874, 2021.
6.
V. Dilli Ganesh and R. M. Bommi, "Prediction of Tool Wear by Using RGB Techniques in Comparison with Experimental Analysis", 2022 Int. Conf. Data Sci. Agents Artif In tell. (ICDSAAI), 2022.
7.
M. Gopal, "Effect of Machining Parameters and Optimization of Temperature Rise in Turning Operation of Aluminium-6061 Using RSM and Artificial Neural Network", Period. Poly tech. Mech. Eng., vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 141-150, 2021.
8.
Y. D. Chethan, H. V. Ravindra and Y. T. Krishne Gowda, "Machined Surface Monitoring in Turning Using Histogram Analysis by Machine Vision", Mater. Today Proc., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 7775-7781, 2018.
9.
R. Kshetri, Ajay, S. Kaushik and V. Sati, "Tool wear analysis during turning of hard material by simulink", Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol., vol. 8, no. 5 Special Issue 3, pp. 28-31, 2019.
10.
M. S. Alajmi and A. M. Almeshal, "Modeling of cutting force in the turning of aisi 4340 using gaussian process regression algorithm", Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 9, 2021.
11.
M. P. P. Vignesh, "Tool Wear Monitoring By Image Processing", Int. J. Eng. Res. Tecnol., no. April, 2013.
12.
F. Boukezzi and R. Noureddine, "Surface Roughness Prediction Using Ann And Rsm", A Comparative 5 Th International Conference On Advances In Mechanical Engineering Istanbul 2019, no. December, December 2019.
13.
S. Lakshmana Kumar, V. Jacintha, A. Mahendran, R. M. Bommi, M. Nagaraj and U. Kandasamy, "A Machine Learning Approach to Optimize Model and Predict the Machining Factors in Dry Drilling of Nimonic C263", Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2022, 2022.
14.
M. Bozdemir, "Prediction of Surface Roughness considering Cutting Parameters and Humidity Condition in End Milling of Polyamide Materials", Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2018, no. 2018.
15.
M. Gupta and S. Kumar, "Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in turning using grey relational analysis", Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 547-558, 2013.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.