Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
BOOM: Bottleneck-Aware Opportunistic Multicast Strategy for Cooperative Maritime Sensing | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

BOOM: Bottleneck-Aware Opportunistic Multicast Strategy for Cooperative Maritime Sensing


Abstract:

With the advancements in sensing technologies, maritime sensing has become indispensable in various domains, including logistics, weather forecasting, and marine ranching...Show More

Abstract:

With the advancements in sensing technologies, maritime sensing has become indispensable in various domains, including logistics, weather forecasting, and marine ranching. However, transmitting large volumes of sensing data faces many challenges in the maritime environment. First, the transmissions purely depend on satellite links often costly and suffer from long propagation latency. On the other hand, traditional unicast transmission results in data duplication, wasting valuable marine communication resources. With the increasing density of sensing devices, the communication distance between maritime sensors has become closer, enabling the deployment of maritime opportunistic networks consisting of device-to-device links. Rather than using unicast transmission over satellite links, employing multicast with opportunistic routing enables simultaneous data transmission to multiple destinations and saves communication resources. Even though the multicast method can avoid redundancy, conducting multicast without considering the maritime characteristics (i.e., the dynamics and the distribution of sensors) may lead to inefficient data delivery. Through real-world experiments, we observe that devices located on the edges of the network have a relatively low receiving rate compared with internal ones and tend to be the bottleneck of the overall multicast progress. Based on this observation, we propose BOOM, a bottleneck-aware opportunistic multicast strategy aiming at reducing multicast latency, taking into account the influence of the bottleneck node and broadcasting rate. Prominently, within maritime scenarios challenged by extreme conditions, such as storms, typhoons, and tsunamis, BOOM’s emphasis encompasses the adaptability of multicast strategies, which necessitates dynamic adjustments in response to equipment failures and shifts in network topology. Through mathematical analysis, we prove the formation of opportunistic multicast is an NP-hard problem and further des...
Published in: IEEE Internet of Things Journal ( Volume: 11, Issue: 3, 01 February 2024)
Page(s): 3733 - 3748
Date of Publication: 05 October 2023

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Maritime sensing plays a crucial role in various aspects of our world, including logistics, commerce, and climate change. Maritime devices equipped with communication modules (e.g., vessels, buoys, and coastal towers) could behave as wireless sensors and offer a diverse range of smart maritime sensing services, including marine pollution monitoring [1], search and rescue (SAR) [2], and remote piloting [3].

Select All
1.
C. D. Clark, "Satellite remote sensing for marine pollution investigations", Marine Pollution Bull., vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 357-368, 1993.
2.
J. Peng and C. Shi, "Remote sensing application in the maritime search and rescue" in Remote Sensing-Applications, London, U.K.:IntechOpen, 2012.
3.
B. Brooks, T. Coltman and M. Yang, "Technological innovation in the maritime industry: The case of remote pilotage and enhanced navigational assistance", J. Navig., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 777-793, 2016.
4.
H. Shreehari and M. Supreeth, "Starlink satellite Internet service", Int. J. Res. Publ. Rev., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 4501-4504, 2022.
5.
H.-S. Kim, J.-H. Na and E. Cho, "Resource allocation policy to avoid interference between cellular and D2D links/and D2D links in mobile networks", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Inf. Netw. (ICOIN), pp. 588-591, 2014.
6.
C.-M. Chou, C.-Y. Li, W.-M. Chien and K.-C. Lan, "A feasibility study on vehicle-to-infrastructure communication: WiFi vs. WiMAX", Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Mobile Data Manag. Syst. Services Middleware, pp. 397-398, 2009.
7.
H. R. Abdulshaheed, Z. T. Yaseen, A. M. Salman and I. Al_Barazanchi, "A survey on the use of WiMAX and Wi-Fi on vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs)", Proc. IOP Conf. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 870, 2020.
8.
A. S. Aisjah and S. Arifin, "Maritime weather prediction using fuzzy logic in java sea for shipping feasibility", Int. J. Artif. Intell., vol. 10, no. S13, pp. 112-122, 2013.
9.
S. Pfennig and E. Franz, "Adjustable redundancy for secure network coding in a unicast scenario", Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Netw. Coding (NetCod), pp. 1-6, 2014.
10.
C.-M. Huang, K.-C. Lan and C.-Z. Tsai, "A survey of opportunistic networks", Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Netw. Appl. Workshops (AINA Workshops), pp. 1672-1677, 2008.
11.
H. Lim and C. Kim, "Multicast tree construction and flooding in wireless ad hoc networks", Proc. 3rd ACM Int. Workshop Model. Anal. Simulat. Wireless Mobile Syst., pp. 61-68, 2000.
12.
J. Jankowski, P. Bródka, P. Kazienko, B. K. Szymanski, R. Michalski and T. Kajdanowicz, "Balancing speed and coverage by sequential seeding in complex networks", Sci. Rep., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 891, 2017.
13.
O. Salman, I. H. Elhajj, A. Kayssi and A. Chehab, "SDN controllers: A comparative study", Proc. IEEE 18th Mediterr. Electrotechn. Conf. (MELECON), pp. 1-6, 2016.
14.
R. Palanki and J. S. Yedidia, "Rateless codes on noisy channels", Proc. Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT), pp. 37, 2004.
15.
M. Ahmed, S. Reno, M. R. Rahman and S. H. Rifat, "Analysis of netcode latency and packet-loss in online multiplayer games", Proc. Int. Conf. Augmented Intell. Sustain. Syst. (ICAISS), pp. 1198-1202, 2022.
16.
K. Pang, Z. Lin, B. F. Uchoa-Filho and B. Vucetic, "Distributed network coding for wireless sensor networks based on rateless LT codes", IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 561-564, Dec. 2012.
17.
R. Gandhi, A. Mishra and S. Parthasarathy, "Minimizing broadcast latency and redundancy in ad hoc networks", IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 840-851, Aug. 2008.
18.
M. Monmonier, Rhumb Lines and Map Wars: A Social History of the Mercator Projection, Chicago, IL, USA:Univ. Chicago Press, 2019.
19.
J. Sklansky, "Finding the convex hull of a simple polygon", Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79-83, 1982.
20.
R. L. Graham, "An efficient algorithm for determining the convex hull of a finite planar set", Inf. Process. Lett., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 132-133, 1972.
21.
A. Harati-Mokhtari, A. Wall, P. Brooks and J. Wang, "Automatic identification system (AIS): Data reliability and human error implications", J. Navigation, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 373-389, 2007.
22.
VT explorer, Jun. 2023, [online] Available: https://www.vtexplorer.com/.
23.
H. Fleischner, "The square of every two-connected graph is hamiltonian", J. Comb. Theory B, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 29-34, 1974.
24.
U. Brandes, "A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality", J. Math. Sociol., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 163-177, 2001.
25.
E. Dinc and O. B. Akan, "Beyond-line-of-sight communications with ducting layer", IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 37-43, Oct. 2014.
26.
J. Wang et al., "Wireless channel models for maritime communications", IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 68070-68088, 2018.
27.
  Goel and   Munagala, "Extending greedy multicast routing to delay sensitive applications", Algorithmica, vol. 33, pp. 335-352, Jul. 2002.
28.
J. Lee, H. Kim, E. Lee, S.-H. Kim and M. Gerla, "Farthest destination selection and shortest path connection strategy for efficient multicasting in vehicular ad hoc networks", Proc. IEEE 13th IEEE Annu. Consum. Commun. Netw. Conf. (CCNC), pp. 996-999, 2016.
29.
X. Lyu, C. Zhang, C. Ren and Y. Hou, "Distributed graph-based optimization of multicast data dissemination for Internet of Vehicles", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 3117-3128, Mar. 2023.
30.
S. Martin, An Introduction to Ocean Remote Sensing, Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.