Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Federated Split Learning With Data and Label Privacy Preservation in Vehicular Networks | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Federated Split Learning With Data and Label Privacy Preservation in Vehicular Networks


Abstract:

Federatedlearning (FL) is an emerging distributed learning paradigm widely used in vehicular networks, where vehicles are enabled to train the deep model for the server w...Show More

Abstract:

Federatedlearning (FL) is an emerging distributed learning paradigm widely used in vehicular networks, where vehicles are enabled to train the deep model for the server while keeping private data locally. However, the annotation of private data by vehicular users is very difficult since the high costs and professional needs, and one solution is that roadside infrastructures could provide label mapping to the data according to the geographical coordinates. In this scenario where vehicles and roadside infrastructures hold the data and labels, respectively, traditional FL is not applicable since it needs each participant to have both data and labels. In this article, we propose a federated split learning (FSL) paradigm that split the deep model into two submodels which are trained separately in the vehicles and the roadside infrastructures. The vehicles and the roadside infrastructures exchange the intermediate data (i.e., smashed data and cut layer gradients) in training local submodels and upload the local gradients to the global server for aggregation into the global model. Specifically, we first adopt three types of privacy attacks to demonstrate that attackers could recover the private data and labels according to the shared intermediate data and uploaded local gradients. We then propose a differential privacy (DP)-based defense mechanism to defend the privacy attacks by perturbing the intermediate data. Furthermore, we design a contract-based incentive mechanism that encourages vehicles and roadside infrastructures to enhance training performance by adjusting their privacy strategies. The simulation results illustrated that the proposed defense mechanism can remarkably emasculate the performance of attacks and the proposed incentive mechanism is efficient in the FSL paradigm for vehicular networks.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology ( Volume: 73, Issue: 1, January 2024)
Page(s): 1223 - 1238
Date of Publication: 24 August 2023

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

In Ubiquitous intelligence of future 6G vehicular networks, deep model training is critical since it can mine knowledge from vehicular data to improve the quality of many artificial intelligence (AI) driven vehicular services [1]. When executing the model training, the traditional centralized learning paradigm requires vehicles to upload their raw data to a central server. This leads to significant communication overheads and the risk of privacy leakage for vehicles. With increasing emphasis on privacy and widespread deployment of edge computing in vehicular networks, federated learning (FL) emerges as a promising distributed learning paradigm. FL enables the vehicles to train the local model with private data, and further upload the local gradients to the global server for aggregation to achieve the global model training [2]. In this process, the vehicles retain private data and only upload local gradients of which size is much smaller, which significantly reduces the communication overheads and alleviates the risk of privacy leakage [3].

Select All
1.
Z. Wei, B. Li, R. Zhang, X. Cheng and L. Yang, "Many-to-many task offloading in vehicular fog computing: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach", IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., Feb. 2023.
2.
B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson and B. A. y Arcas, "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data", Proc. Artif. Intell. Statist., pp. 1273-1282, 2017.
3.
D. Shi et al., "To talk or to work: Dynamic batch sizes assisted time efficient federated learning over future mobile edge devices", IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 11038-11050, Dec. 2022.
4.
W. Wu et al., "Split learning over wireless networks: Parallel design and resource management", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1051-1066, Apr. 2023.
5.
Y. Liu, J. James, J. Kang, D. Niyato and S. Zhang, "Privacy-preserving traffic flow prediction: A federated learning approach", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 7751-7763, Aug. 2020.
6.
C. Fu et al., "Label inference attacks against vertical federated learning", Proc. 31st USENIX Secur. Symp., pp. 1397-1414, 2022.
7.
X. Tu, K. Zhu, N. C. Luong, D. Niyato, Y. Zhang and J. Li, "Incentive mechanisms for federated learning: From economic and game theoretic perspective", IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 8, pp. 1566-1593, Sep. 2022.
8.
Y. Wu, Y. Song, T. Wang, L. Qian and T. Q. S. Quek, "Non-orthogonal multiple access assisted federated learning via wireless power transfer: A cost-efficient approach", IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 2853-2869, Apr. 2022.
9.
L. Li, D. Shi, R. Hou, H. Li, M. Pan and Z. Han, "To talk or to work: Flexible communication compression for energy efficient federated learning over heterogeneous mobile edge devices", Proc. IEEE INFOCOM-IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 1-10, 2021.
10.
Y. Li, X. Tao, X. Zhang, J. Liu and J. Xu, "Privacy-preserved federated learning for autonomous driving", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 8423-8434, Jul. 2022.
11.
J.-H. Chen, M.-R. Chen, G.-Q. Zeng and J.-S. Weng, "BDFL: A Byzantine-fault-tolerance decentralized federated learning method for autonomous vehicle", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 8639-8652, Sep. 2021.
12.
M. Dai, Y. Wu, L. Qian, Z. Su, B. Lin and N. Chen, "UAV-assisted multi-access computation offloading via hybrid NOMA and FDMA in marine networks", IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 113-127, Jan./Feb. 2023.
13.
X. Huang, P. Li, R. Yu, Y. Wu, K. Xie and S. Xie, "FedParking: A federated learning based parking space estimation with parked vehicle assisted edge computing", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 9355-9368, Sep. 2021.
14.
X. Zhou, W. Liang, J. She, Z. Yan and K. I. -K. Wang, "Two-layer federated learning with heterogeneous model aggregation for 6G supported Internet of Vehicles", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 5308-5317, Jun. 2021.
15.
Q. Kong et al., "Privacy-preserving aggregation for federated learning-based navigation in vehicular fog", IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 8453-8463, Dec. 2021.
16.
O. Gupta and R. Raskar, "Distributed learning of deep neural network over multiple agents", J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 116, pp. 1-8, 2018.
17.
M. Wu et al., "Split learning with differential privacy for integrated terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks", IEEE Wireless Commun., Apr. 2023.
18.
Y. Gao et al., "Evaluation and optimization of distributed machine learning techniques for Internet of Things", IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 2538-2552, Oct. 2022.
19.
M. Gawali et al., "Comparison of privacy-preserving distributed deep learning methods in healthcare", Proc. Annu. Conf. Med. Image Understanding Anal., pp. 457-471, 2021.
20.
C. Thapa, P. C. M. Arachchige, S. Camtepe and L. Sun, "Splitfed: When federated learning meets split learning", Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., pp. 8485-8493, 2022.
21.
V. Turina, Z. Zhang, F. Esposito and I. Matta, "Combining split and federated architectures for efficiency and privacy in deep learning", Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Emerg. Netw. EXperiments Technol., pp. 562-563, 2020.
22.
X. Liu, Y. Deng and T. Mahmoodi, "Energy efficient user scheduling for hybrid split and federated learning in wireless UAV networks", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., pp. 1-6, 2022.
23.
M. Song et al., "Analyzing user-level privacy attack against federated learning", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2430-2444, Oct. 2020.
24.
T. Dang, O. Thakkar, S. Ramaswamy, R. Mathews, P. Chin and F. Beaufays, "Revealing and protecting labels in distributed training", Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 1727-1738, 2021.
25.
L. Zhu, Z. Liu and S. Han, "Deep leakage from gradients", Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., pp. 14774-14784, 2019.
26.
Y. Li, H. Li, G. Xu, T. Xiang and R. Lu, "Practical privacy-preserving federated learning in vehicular fog computing", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 4692-4705, May 2022.
27.
P. Vepakomma, A. Singh, O. Gupta and R. Raskar, "Nopeek: Information leakage reduction to share activations in distributed deep learning", Proc. Int. Conf. Data Mining Workshops, pp. 933-942, 2020.
28.
Z. He, T. Zhang and R. B. Lee, "Attacking and protecting data privacy in edge–cloud collaborative inference systems", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 9706-9716, Jun. 2021.
29.
J. Liu and X. Lyu, "Clustering label inference attack against practical split learning", 2022.
30.
E. Moradi-Pari, D. Tian, M. Bahramgiri, S. Rajab and S. Bai, "DSRC versus LTE-V2X: Empirical performance analysis of direct vehicular communication technologies", IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 4889-4903, May 2023.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.