Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Objective quality assessment of MPEG-2 video streams by using CBP neural networks | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Objective quality assessment of MPEG-2 video streams by using CBP neural networks


Abstract:

The increasing use of compression standards in broadcasting digital TV has raised the need for established criteria to measure perceived quality. Novel methods must take ...Show More

Abstract:

The increasing use of compression standards in broadcasting digital TV has raised the need for established criteria to measure perceived quality. Novel methods must take into account the specific artifacts introduced by digital compression techniques. This paper presents a methodology using circular backpropagation (CBP) neural networks for the objective quality assessment of motion picture expert group (MPEG) video streams. Objective features are continuously extracted from compressed video streams on a frame-by-frame basis; they feed the CBP network estimating the corresponding perceived quality. The resulting adaptive modeling of subjective perception supports a real-time system for monitoring displayed video quality. The overall system mimics perception but does not require an analytical model of the underlying physical phenomenon. The ability to process compressed video streams represents a crucial advantage over existing approaches, as avoiding the decoding process greatly enhances the system's real-time performance. Experimental evidence confirmed the approach validity. The system was tested on real test videos; they included different contents ranging from fiction to sport. The neural model provided a satisfactory, continuous-time approximation for actual scoring curves, which was validated statistically in terms of confidence analysis. As expected, videos with slow-varying contents such as fiction featured the best performances.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks ( Volume: 13, Issue: 4, July 2002)
Page(s): 939 - 947
Date of Publication: 31 July 2002

ISSN Information:

PubMed ID: 18244489
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The recent increasing success of digital TV has stimulated the research for objective automated methods to assess the user-end perception of broadcasting. The underlying technical problem is to estimate the effects of the visual artifacts brought about by digital encoding. In this sense, traditional techniques for analog data processing often prove ineffective in measuring the perceived quality of a digital compressed video.

Select All
1.
Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures, 2000.
2.
S. Olsson, M. Stroppiana and J. Baïna, "Objective methods for assessment of video quality: State of the art", IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 43, pp. 487-95, Dec. 1997.
3.
W. Y. Zou and P. J. Corriveau, "Methods for evaluation of digital television picture quality", IEEE Broadcast Tech. Soc.th Meet. G-2.1.6 Audio Video Techniques Committee G-2.1 Compression Processing Subcommittee, 1997-May.
4.
D. K. Fibush, "Pratical application of objective picture quality measurements", SMPTE J., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 10-9, Jan. 1999.
5.
S. D. Voran and S. Wolf, "The development and evaluation of an objective video quality assessment system that emulates human viewing panels", Proc. IBC 1992IEE Int. Broadcast. Conv., pp. 504-8, 1992.
6.
M. Ardito and M. Visca, "Correlation between objective and subjective measurements for video compressed systems", SMPTE J., vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 768-73, Dec. 1996.
7.
G. W. Cermak, S. Wolf, E. P. Tweedy, M. H. Pinson and A. Webster, "Validating objective measures of MPEG video quality", SMPTE J., vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 226-35, Apr. 1998.
8.
A. Pessoa, A. Falcão, R. Nishihara, A. Silva and A. Lotufo, "Video quality assessment using objective parameters based on image segmentation", SMPTE J., vol. 108, no. 12, pp. 865-72, Dec. 1999.
9.
T. Hamada, S. Miyaji and S. Matsumoto, "Picture quality assessment system by three-layered bottom-up noise weighting considering human visual perception", SMPTE J., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 20-6, Jan. 1999.
10.
S. Wolf and M. H. Pinson, "Spatial-temporal distortion metrics for in-service quality monitoring of any digital video systems", Proc. SPIE Int. Symp. Voice Video Data Commun., vol. 3845, pp. 266-77, 1999-Sept.
11.
K. T. Tan and M. Ghanbari, "A multi-metric objective picture quality measurement model for MPEG video", IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 10, pp. 1208-13, Oct. 2000.
12.
T. Vlachos, "Detection of blocking artifacts in compressed video", Electron. Lett., vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 1106-8, June 2000.
13.
F.-H. Lin and R. M. Mersereau, "Rate-quality tradeoff MPEG video encoder", Signal Processing: Image Commun., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 297-309, Feb. 1999.
14.
D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland, Parallel Distributed Processing, MA, Cambridge:MIT Press, 1986.
15.
S. Ridella, S. Rovetta and R. Zunino, "Circular back-propagation networks for classification", IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 8, pp. 84-97, Jan. 1997.
16.
V. N. Vapnik, Statist. Learning Theory, New York:Wiley, 1998.
17.
S. Ridella, S. Rovetta and R. Zunino, "Circular backpropagation networks embed vector quantization", IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 10, pp. 972-975, July 1999.
18.
T. P. Vogl, J. K. Mangis, A. K. Rigler, W. T. Zink and D. L. Alkon, "Accelerating the convergence of the back propagation method", Biol. Cybern., vol. 59, pp. 257-263, 1988.
19.
Information TechnologyGeneric Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio Video Information: Video, 1996.
20.
Introduction of a New Method for Single Stimulus Continuous Quality Evaluation (SSCQE), 1996.
21.
I. T. Joliffe, Principal Component Analysis, New York:Springer-Verlag, 1986.
22.
J. H. Friedman and J. W. Tukey, "A projection pursuit algorithm for exploratory data analysis", IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. C-23, pp. 881-890, Sept. 1974.
23.
J. H. Friedman, "Exploratory projection pursuit", J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., vol. 82, no. 397, pp. 249-266, 1987.
24.
R. Aldridge and D. Pearson, "A calibration method for continuous video quality (SSCQE) measurements", Signal Processing: Image Commun., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 321-32, 2000.
25.
H. de Ridder and R. Hamberg, "Continuous assessment of image quality", SMPTE J., vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 123-8, Feb. 1997.
26.
N. Narita, Y. Sugiura and I. Yuyama, "Time-sensitive evaluation of the quality of digital coded sequences", SMPTE J., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 32-8, Jan. 1999.
27.
H. R. Schiffman, Sensation and PerceptionAn Integrated Approach, New York:Wiley, 1996.
28.
R. Aldridge, J. Davidoff, M. Ghanbari, D. Hands and D. Pearson, "Recency effect in the subjective assessment of digitally-coded television pictures", Proc. MOSAIC Workshop Advanced Methods Evaluation Television Picture Quality, 1995-Sept.
29.
T. M. Martinetz, S. G. Berkovich and K. J. Schulten, "Neural gas network for vector quantization and its application to time-series prediction", IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 4, pp. 558-569, July 1993.
30.
S. Ridella, S. Rovetta and R. Zunino, "K-winner machines for pattern classification", IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, vol. 12, pp. 371-85, Mar. 2001.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.