Introduction
Due to its fundamental importance in power systems, the accurate modeling of a power transmission line plays a very important role in the analyses of power systems [1]. The most important steady-state operation of any power transmission line, both in the planning phase as well as during operation, needs to be carefully evaluated through modeling, which characterizes the study of contingencies [2]. The aim is to evaluate the severity of some limiting loading conditions, in view of checking the stability of not only the studied power transmission line as well as of the whole power system [3].
To perform these evaluations, the adoption of computer programs is quite usual and consolidated, thanks to the wide availability of software with a high degree of accuracy. On the other hand, for some practical circumstances, the analytical evaluation of the behavior of a power transmission line, at a steady state, is preferred. For example, this could be the case of a conceptual analysis of the differences between capacitive and inductive loads.
Modeling a power transmission line by an equivalent single-phase circuit, compressing the effects of all the phase conductors and grounding wires in the nominal
Phasor data of voltage to ground and current of each phase is becoming increasingly available to system operators as new phasor measurement units (PMU) are being adopted in the power system on a larger scale [5]. The PMU equipment provides time-referenced values of the amplitude of voltage and current for each phase [6], as well as their phase angle, within pre-defined time intervals, which perfectly serve for the purposes of the proposed method.
This data in combination with the proposed method allows accurate evaluation of the behavior of each of the phases of a transmission line. To demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method, this work shows its application to a real transmission line that is operated by the Swedish Transmission System Operator (TSO) Svenska Kraftnät, between the cities of Alvesta and Tenhult.
Proposed Analytical Method
The analytical method to more accurately analyze an unsymmetrical three-phase system is derived in the following section. Considering the following two basic phasor matrix equations that rule the behavior of voltage and current of each conductor of a transmission line along its length (\begin{align*} \frac {d}{dx}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x)}\right]&=-\left [{{\dot {Z }}_{r,s,t}}\right]\left [{{\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}(x)}\right] \tag{1}\\ \frac {d}{dx}\left [{{\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}(x)}\right]&=-\left [{{\dot {Y} }_{r,s,t}}\right]\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x)}\right] \tag{2}\end{align*}
The process of matrix reduction is performed through the method of Kron [8], which allows the reduction of the order of the matrixes based on the assumption of null voltage for the grounding wires. After differentiation of (1) and application of (2), the following second-order matrix equation is obtained:\begin{equation*} \frac {d^{2}}{dx^{2}}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}\left ({x}\right)}\right]=\left [{{\dot {\gamma }}_{r,s,t}}\right]^{2}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}\left ({x}\right)}\right] \tag{3}\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*} \left [{ {\dot {\gamma }}_{r,s,t}}\right]=\sqrt {\left [{ {\dot {Z}}_{r,s,t}}\right]\left [{{\dot {Y}}_{r,s,t}}\right]} \tag{4}\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*} L\left \{{\frac {d^{2}}{dx^{2}}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x)}\right]}\right \}=L\left \{{\left [{{\dot {\gamma }}_{r,s,t} }\right]^{2}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x)}\right]}\right \} \tag{5}\end{equation*}
\begin{align*} \left [{{\dot {\gamma }}_{r,s,t} }\right]^{2} \left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right]&= s^{2}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right] \\ &\quad {-} s\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x=0)}\right]\!-\!\frac {d}{dx}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x=0)}\right] \tag{6}\end{align*}
\begin{align*} \left [{{\dot {\gamma }}_{r,s,t} }\right]^{2}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right]&= s^{2}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right] \\ &\quad {-} s\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x=0)}\right] \\ &\quad +\left [{{\dot {Z }}_{r,s,t}}\right]\left [{{\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}(x=0)}\right] \tag{7}\end{align*}
\begin{align*} &\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right]= \left \{{s^{2}\left [{i}\right]-\left [{{\dot {\gamma }}_{r,s,t}}\right]^{2}}\right \}^{-1} \\ & \left \{{s\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x=0)}\right] -\left [{{\dot {Z}}_{r,s,t}}\right]\left [{{\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}(x=0)}\right] }\right \} \tag{8}\end{align*}
Finally, the voltage to the ground along the length for each conductor is obtained after the operation of inversion of the Laplace transform \begin{equation*} \begin{matrix} \left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x)}\right]=L^{-1}\left \{{\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right]}\right \} \end{matrix} \tag{9}\end{equation*}
\begin{align*} \left [{{\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}(x)}\right]&=L^{-1}\left \{{\left [{{\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right]}\right \} \\ &= L^{-1}\left \{{\left [{\frac {\left [{{\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}(x=0)}\right]-\left [{{\dot {Y}}_{r,s,t}}\right]\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right]}{s}}\right]}\right \} \tag{10}\end{align*}
\begin{align*} {\left [{ {\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}\left ({x-x_{o}}\right)}\right]}&=L^{-1}\left \{{e^{-x_{o}s}\left [{{\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right]}\right \} \tag{11}\\ {\left [{{\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}\left ({x-x_{o}}\right)}\right]}& = L^{-1}\left \{{e^{-x_{o}s}\left [{{\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}(s)}\right]}\right \} \tag{12}\end{align*}
\begin{align*} {\dot {V}}_{r,s,t}(x-x_{o}) &= {\sum _{i=1}^{3} (\dot {A_{i}}e^{\alpha _{i}x}+\dot {B_{i}}e^{-\alpha _{i}x})_{r,s,t}} \tag{13}\\ {\dot {I}}_{r,s,t}(x-x_{o})&={\dot {C}}_{r,s,t}+{\sum _{i=1}^{3}(\dot {D_{i}}e^{\alpha _{i}x}+\dot {E_{i}}e^{-\alpha _{i}x})_{r,s,t}} \tag{14}\end{align*}
All of these values are different for each of the phases,
Related Works
The steady state of power lines can be analyzed by the characteristics of faults in the power system, Jia et al. [11] evaluated the overvoltage caused by switch-tripping faults in ultra-high voltage lines, control measures to mitigate the overvoltage are described by them to give a baseline for restricting the overvoltage in steady-state. Polajžer et al. [12] evaluated faults considering an inverter interfaced in the steady state of transmission networks.
Yuan et al. [13] presented a unified power flow controller for steady-state modeling of power grids. Yuan et al. [14] presented a study about steady-state modeling and the optimal operation of the electrical power system with flexible alternating current transmission systems.
The study of PMU has been researched by authors focusing on the improvement of the way it is measured. Affijulla and Tripathy [15] presented a simple phasor estimator. The measured signals feed the PMU prototype with the proposed model running for the phasor calculation of signals in the electrical power system. The presented prototype has a low-cost PMU for smart grid applications.
Qin et al. [16] presented a remote field testing of the PMU using a performance analyzer. As they highlighted the PMU is necessary to ensure the precision of synchrophasor-based control. Given that several PMU testing are performed manually, in their application, it is proposed to perform PMU testing remotely. They have shown that using a field-programmable gate array was possible to measure the system under the specifications.
The evaluation of enhancing the PMU for the analysis of the power quality has been done by several authors, Pegoraro et al. [17] evaluated the compensation of systematic measurement errors in PMU for monitoring distribution power lines, Mingotti, Peretto, and Tinarelli [18] an equivalent synchronization process for the PMU, Bernard et al. [23] studied the harmonic and interharmonic phasor estimation for PMU.
Chernikova, Kosteletskii, and Zabolotsky [19] propose analytical models that accurately capture the behavior of transmission lines, considering the effects of impedance discontinuities, line length, and termination conditions. The differential and common mode voltage and current distributions along the transmission line are derived, enabling the calculation of important parameters of the grids.
The work of Pu et al. [20] provides a comprehensive overview of analytical methods for detecting and protecting against faults in direct current transmission lines, with a specific focus on single-ended protection techniques. In their work, The single-ended protection techniques utilize measurements taken at a single end of the transmission line to detect faults.
Feng et al. [21] presented how the reliability of high-voltage direct current systems can be affected by various external factors, such as temperature, wind, and pollution. To address this concern, they propose a multi-factor reliability evaluation method that incorporates these environmental parameters into the analysis. Their method utilizes probabilistic models and Monte Carlo simulations to assess the impact of each external factor on the overall reliability of the transmission power lines.
Mustafa et al. [22] presented a methodology that combines theoretical modeling with practical considerations to accurately represent the behavior of power transmission lines. Their analytical method takes into account various parameters, including line length, conductor spacing, and material properties, to determine the line’s impedance, voltage drop, and power loss characteristics. The results show agreement between the modeled and measured data, validating the reliability of their method.
As presented in [24], the measure of the electric field is an alternative way to evaluate if the power system is well designed and is under the required specifications. In their application, the finite element method (FEM) is used to evaluate the optimal design of spacers of distribution power grids. In the work of Zuo et al. [25] electromagnetic field problems are considered using a combination of FEM and boundary element methods. In [26] the analysis is regarding the insulators, showing high performance when combined with optimization methods.
In [27] the evaluation of different methods used for calculating the electric field in transmission lines is presented. The load simulation method, the FEM, and the measured electric field are compared considering a 525 kV power transmission line. The results showed that the FEM is closer to the results of the measured electric field when the measure is under the cables (close to the center of the power line), after 10 m from the center of the transmission line, the load simulation method was more promising compared to the FEM.
Besides the analytical and optimization methods of analyzing power systems, there is an increasing interest in the application of artificial intelligence models especially based on deep learning for fault identification in transmission lines [28]. According to Souza et al. [29], the use of hybrid methods may outperform well-defined models.
Study of a Practical Case
The application of the proposed method is illustrated through a case based on measurements performed in a 400 kV power transmission line, 97.3 km long, non-perfectly transposed, located in Southern Sweden. This line is operated by the Swedish TSO Svenska Kraftnät (SvK) and connects the power substations of the cities of Tenhult and Alvesta. The cross-section view of this power transmission line is shown in Figure 1, where all the important distances are indicated, whereas in Table 1 the most important characteristics of the conductors are also given.
Cross-section view of the conductors with distances for the 400 kV – SvK – Alvesta/Tenhult power transmission line.
The values of the electric resistance of all the conductors were obtained from the manufacturer’s catalogs. In addition, since the average value of the electric resistivity of the local soil has been assumed as equal to
Based on all these data, the obtained elements of the \begin{align*} \left [{\begin{matrix}0.02+ j0.36 j0.1048 j 0.0644 j 0.1149 j 0.0813\\ j 0.1048 0.02+ j 0.36 j 0.1048 j 0.1157 j 0.1157\\ j 0.0644 j 0.1048 0.02+ j 0.36 j 0.0813 j 0.1149\\ j 0.1149 j 0.1157 j 0.0813 0.32+j 0.58 j 0.1230\\ j 0.0813 j 0.1157 j 0.1149 j 0.1230 0.32+j 0.58\\ \end{matrix}}\right] \tag{15}\\ \\ j\left [{\begin{matrix}3.4871&-0.7265&-0.2417&-0.4741&-0.1972\\ -0.7265&3.7236&-0.7265&-0.4125&-0.4125\\ -0.2417&-0.7265&3.4871&-0.1972&-0.4741\\ -0.4741&-0.4125&-0.1972&2.1716&-0.2750\\ -0.1972&-0.4125&-0.4741&-0.2750&2.1716\\ \end{matrix}}\right] \tag{16}\end{align*}
Thus, in accordance with the method of Kron for matrix reduction, both the matrixes were reduced to \begin{align*} \left [{\begin{matrix}0.0341+j0.3377 & 0.0124+j0.0780 &0.0099+j0.0425 \\ 0.0124+j0.0780 & 0.0376+j0.3297 & 0.0124+j0.0780\\ 0.0099+j0.0425&0.0124+j0.0780&0.0341+j0.3377\\ \end{matrix}}\right] \tag{17}\end{align*}
\begin{align*} j\left [{\begin{matrix}j3.487089&-j0.726499&-j0.241746\\ -j0.726499&j3.723602&-j0.726500\\ -j0.241746&-j0.726499&j3.487089\\ \end{matrix}}\right] \tag{18}\end{align*}
Now, by setting the reference of length,
A. Instant 1 — Local Time: 13:37:16
These were the values for phase voltage and current at \begin{align*} {\dot {V}}_{r\left ({x=0}\right)}&=238900.9\angle 123.95V \\ V &= -133429.5+j198167.1 V \tag{19}\\ {\dot {V}}_{s\left ({x=0}\right)}&= 239356.7\angle 4.00V \\ V & = 238773.1 + j16704.8 V \tag{20}\\ {\dot {V}}_{t\left ({x=0}\right)}&= 239413.8\angle -116.11V \\ V &= -105349.7 - j214989.3 V \tag{21}\\ {\dot {I}}_{r\left ({x=0}\right)}&=146.6\angle -114.8A \\ A &= -61.4 - j133.1 A \tag{22}\\ {\dot {I}}_{s\left ({x=0}\right)} &= 137.8\angle 125.5A \\ A &= -80.1 + j112.2 A \tag{23}\\ {\dot {I}}_{t\left ({x=0}\right)}&= 145.7\angle 7.5A \\ A &= 144.4+ j18.9 A \tag{24}\end{align*}
After the application of these data to the proposed method, the values predicted for voltage and current at the Tenhult power substation were evaluated and compared to the real PMU data, as shown in Table 2.
The analytical results had a very high good likelihood with the actual measured values, at the Tenhult power substation, which confirms the accuracy of the proposed method. Therefore, results like active and reactive power at both ends agree, too. The calculated phase voltage and current behavior along this line, at this same instant, may also be obtained by the proposed method and is shown in Figs. 2 and 3.
Profile of phase voltage to the ground along the line length at the Instant 1: (a) Amplitude; (b) Phase angle.
Profile of phase current along the line length at the Instant 1: 3(a) Amplitude; 3(b) Phase angle.
From the graphics of Fig. 2(a), it is noticeable not only how unbalanced the voltage amplitudes are as well as the points where each of the transposition happens, along the line length. Moreover, from Fig. 2(b) it is noticeable how stable the behavior of the phase angle of each phase voltage is.
Regarding the behavior of the profiles of phase current, the graphics of Fig. 3(a) show that the current amplitude is similarly unbalanced as the voltage, whereas graphics of Fig. 3(b) show that the changes in the phase angle of current along the line length are more significant than for the phase angle of voltage.
B. Instant 2 — Local Time: 13:40:47
After less than three minutes, new values were gathered for the phase voltage and current at \begin{align*} \dot {V}_{r\left ({x=0}\right)}&=238925.2\angle 154.42V \\ V &= -215513.2+ j103147.1 V \tag{25}\\ {\dot {V}}_{s\left ({x=0}\right)}&= 239324.4\angle 34.47V \\ V &= 197289.7 + j135473.0 V \tag{26}\\ {\dot {V}}_{t\left ({x=0}\right)}&= 239444.8\angle -85.62V \\ V& = 18301.0 - j238744.4 V \tag{27}\\ {\dot {I}}_{r}&=152.4\angle 281.76A \\ A &= 31.054 - j149.198 A \tag{28}\\ {\dot {I}}_{s\left ({x=0}\right)}& = 144.0\angle 162.2A \\ A &= -137.154 + j43.906 A \tag{29}\\ {\dot {I}}_{t\left ({x=0}\right)}&= 152.1\angle 43.8A \\ A & = 109.714+ j105.275 A \tag{30}\end{align*}
Once more, by applying the measured data to the proposed analytical method, the values for voltage to ground and current at the Tenhult power substation could be then predicted. Table 3 shows the comparison between the so predicted and the actual values.
Once again, the obtained results indicate good coherence with the measured data. Thus, in a similar way as done for Instant 1, the behavior of voltage to ground and current along the line is shown in the graphics of Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. In comparison to the respective graphics of Figs. 2 and 3 it is noticeable that, on average, the voltage has remained the same whereas the current has experienced a slight increase in its amplitude.
Profile of phase voltage to ground at the Instant 2: 4(a) Amplitude; 4(b) Phase angle.
Thus, since the essence of this work is to propose the use of the presented analytical model as a more complete tool of analysis instead of the usual nominal
After that, both symmetrical matrixes were converted into the matrixes of sequences, positive, negative, and zero. Figure 6 illustrates the nominal
Circuit of unique and equivalent
For the comparison of the proposed method and based on the PMU data as the reference, phase
Discussion
From the comparison to the PMU data, for the three-phase current and voltage to ground, the obtained and shown results seem to agree very well with the actual data, which makes it as being more realistic in giving a better comprehension of the behavior of each of the three phases. Similar results could be also obtained through computer computation, widely available and in which several
If only a single phase is used to represent the whole transmission, line the phase
Regarding the proposed method itself, it is important to mention that the key step is the inversion of the Laplace transforms, represented by (13) and (14). This inversion has become available in a relatively recent time, thanks to the development of advanced mathematical software. Some years ago, this inversion would be restricted to scientific computers and thus the use of a unique
In addition, for a more detailed description of the steps of calculation by the proposed method, in [10] is presented the application of this same method for a real transmission line. In that work, even though the PMU data are not available, the application of this proposed method is performed with the basis of the often-desired condition of balanced three-phase voltage and current and the presented results show that this idealized condition is immediately lost when dealing with a real transmission line, which further show the advantages of the proposition in taking each of the phases in an analytical study.
In [9], an additional advantage is illustrated for analyzing the behavior of the voltage and current of each phase along the line length, which is to predict the occurrence of overvoltage or overcurrent in points of the line located between both of its ends. This characteristic also suggests that the proposed method can be applied in the online monitoring of power transmission lines. In fact, there is a vast myriad of applications for the proposed method.
Conclusion
The results presented in this work show that the usual analytical modeling of a power transmission line through the classical and unique
In the case of the unavailability of these kinds of data, the method loses some importance, however, it remains useful in some applications. For example, the method allows evaluating conditions of occurrence of overvoltage along the line length as well as showing how a real transmission line naturally adds unbalance to the power system. In any case, the proposed method may be used in order to achieve a more realistic simulation of a transmission line in conditions like under the increase in the amount of transmittable power, simulation of faults, and analyses of power harmonic and sub-harmonic propagation, besides various others. On the other hand, thanks to the possibility of determining the behavior of voltage and current of each phase of the line, the proposed method also allows a more accurate and realistic evaluation of the level of magnetic and electric fields along each point of the same line.
At last, besides the crucial proposition of replacing the traditional and classical unique
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors acknowledge the RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, the operator of the Swedish power transmission system, the SvK - Svenska Kraftnät, the exchange program of the Swedish Government that is the Linnaeus-Palme Program, as well as Prof. Dr. Nasser Hassanieh and the SvK researchers Anders Lindskog and Hannes Hagmar for all the support given for making real the collaboration represented by this work.
This work was supported by the Project Monitoring and Tracking DESARROLLO DE UN HUERTO-INVERNADERO MODULAR Y PERSONALIZABLE CON REGULACIÓN DE LAS CONDICIONES AMBIENTALES EN FUNCIÓN DE LA PRODUCCIÓN, Grant/Award Number: FS/6-2022.