1. Introduction
The forged or manipulated images pose risks in various fields, such as removing copyright watermarks, generating fake news, and even falsifying evidence in court [32]. The growing technology of forgery will cause a crisis of trust and affect social equity. Therefore, the detection of image forgery is of great significance. The crucial aspect of the detection is to model the inconsistency between the forged and authentic regions and to locate the forged regions on the suspicious image, i.e., image forgery localization (IFL). However, as postprocessing techniques such as GAN [16], [26], [63], VAE [27], [44] and homogeneous manipulation [7], [33] are wildly utilized, images can be easily tampered in a visually imperceptible way. These techniques constantly aim to couple the forged and authentic regions' features, making image forgery localization challenging. Therefore, in order to accurately locate the image forgery region, it is particularly essential to decouple the features between forged and authentic regions.
The difference between previous methods and ours. Our method controls the message passing between the forged and authentic regions, ignored by the previous method. As shown by X.