Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Multi-UAV-Assisted Federated Learning for Energy-Aware Distributed Edge Training | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Multi-UAV-Assisted Federated Learning for Energy-Aware Distributed Edge Training


Abstract:

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted mobile edge computing (MEC) has largely extended the border and capacity of artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) by providing a...Show More

Abstract:

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted mobile edge computing (MEC) has largely extended the border and capacity of artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) by providing a key element for enabling flexible distributed data inputs, computing capacity, and high mobility. To enhance data privacy for AIoT applications, federated learning (FL) is becoming a potential solution to perform training tasks locally on distributed IoT devices. However, with the limited onboard resources and battery capacity of each UAV node, optimization is required to achieve a large-scale and high-precision FL scheme. In this work, an optimized multi-UAV-assisted FL framework is designed, where regular IoT devices are in charge of performing training tasks, and multiple UAVs are leveraged to execute local and global aggregation tasks. An online resource allocation (ORA) algorithm is proposed to minimize the training latency by jointly deciding the selection decisions of clients and a global aggregation server. By leveraging the Lyapunov optimization technique, virtual energy queues are studied to depict the energy deficit. With the help of the actor-critic learning framework, a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) scheme is designed to improve per-round training performance. A deep neural network (DNN)-based actor module is designed to derive client selection decisions, and a critic module is proposed through a conventional optimization method to evaluate the obtained selection decisions. Moreover, a greedy scheme is developed to find the optimal global aggregation server. Finally, extensive simulation results demonstrate that the proposed ORA algorithm can achieve optimal training latency and energy consumption under various system settings.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management ( Volume: 21, Issue: 1, February 2024)
Page(s): 280 - 294
Date of Publication: 24 July 2023

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been introduced into the Internet of Things (IoT) frontier to seek efficient solutions, which paves the way for the burgeoning Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) [1], [2], [3]. Especially, deep learning has been proven to be a promising enabler for efficient information retrieval from a tremendous amount of data, in the fields of computer vision and pattern recognition. The great explosion of IoT devices brings the exponential growth of data, where the number of IoT devices will reach 41.6 billion by 2025. To achieve deep insights from the data gathered by IoT devices, edge intelligence has emerged as an enabler to enhance AIoT system performance by providing resources at the edge of the network. However, the limitations of network resources and the concern of privacy leakage make the centralized edge training framework unsuitable for future communication networks [4]. To address the aforementioned issues, federated learning (FL) is becoming a potential approach dedicated to preserving privacy by distributing training tasks among distributed IoT devices [5], [6], [7]. Each IoT device serves as a client to train a shared deep neural network (DNN) model by local data and uploads the computed updates to a server for aggregation.

Select All
1.
S. Arisdakessian, O. A. Wahab, A. Mourad, H. Otrok and M. Guizani, "A survey on IoT intrusion detection: Federated learning game theory social psychology and explainable AI as future directions", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 4059-4092, Mar. 2023.
2.
H. Sami, H. Otrok, J. Bentahar and A. Mourad, "AI-based resource provisioning of IoE services in 6G: A deep reinforcement learning approach", IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 3527-3540, Sep. 2021.
3.
H. Tout, C. Talhi, N. Kara and A. Mourad, "Selective mobile cloud offloading to augment multi-persona performance and viability", IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 314-328, Apr.-Jun. 2019.
4.
M. Chehab and A. Mourad, "LP-SBA-XACML: Lightweight semantics based scheme enabling intelligent behavior-aware privacy for IoT", IEEE Trans. Depend. Secure Comput., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 161-175, Jan./Feb. 2022.
5.
A. Hammoud, H. Otrok, A. Mourad and Z. Dziong, "On demand fog federations for horizontal federated learning in IoV", IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 3062-3075, Sep. 2022.
6.
M. Wazzeh, H. Ould-Slimane, C. Talhi, A. Mourad and M. Guizani, "Privacy-preserving continuous authentication for mobile and IoT systems using warmup-based federated learning", IEEE Netw., Aug. 2022.
7.
M. Arafeh, H. Ould-Slimane, H. Otrok, A. Mourad, C. Talhi and E. Damiani, "Data independent warmup scheme for non-IID federated learning", Inf. Sci., vol. 623, pp. 342-360, Apr. 2023.
8.
A. Mourad, H. Tout, O. A. Wahab, H. Otrok and T. Dbouk, "Ad hoc vehicular fog enabling cooperative low-latency intrusion detection", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 829-843, Jan. 2021.
9.
H. Tout, C. Talhi, N. Kara and A. Mourad, "Smart mobile computation offloading: Centralized selective and multi-objective approach", Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 80, pp. 1-13, Sep. 2017.
10.
S. Arisdakessian, O. A. Wahab, A. Mourad, H. Otrok and N. Kara, "FoGMatch: An intelligent multi-criteria IoT-fog scheduling approach using game theory", IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1779-1789, Aug. 2020.
11.
Q.-V. Pham, M. Zeng, R. Ruby, T. Huynh-The and W.-J. Hwang, "UAV communications for sustainable federated learning", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 3944-3948, Apr. 2021.
12.
Y. Xiao et al., "Fully decentralized federated learning-based on-board mission for UAV swarm system", IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 3296-3300, Oct. 2021.
13.
M. Wazid, B. Bera, A. K. Das, S. P. Mohanty and M. Jo, "Fortifying smart transportation security through public blockchain", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 16532-16545, Sep. 2022.
14.
Y. Zhang, C. Yip, E. Lu and Z. Y. Dong, "A systematic review on technologies and applications in smart campus: A human-centered case study", IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 16134-16149, 2022.
15.
S. Wang et al., "Adaptive federated learning in resource constrained edge computing systems", IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1205-1221, Jun. 2019.
16.
S. AbdulRahman, H. Ould-Slimane, R. Chowdhury, A. Mourad, C. Talhi and M. Guizani, "Adaptive upgrade of client resources for improving the quality of federated learning model", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 4677-4687, Mar. 2023.
17.
M. Chahoud, S. Otoum and A. Mourad, "On the feasibility of federated learning towards on-demand client deployment at the edge", Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 60, no. 1, 2023.
18.
M. Arafeh, H. Otrok, H. Ould-Slimane, A. Mourad, C. Talhi and E. Damiani, "ModularFed: Leveraging modularity in federated learning frameworks", Internet Things, vol. 22, Jul. 2023.
19.
T. Nishio and R. Yonetani, "Client selection for federated learning with heterogeneous resources in mobile edge", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., pp. 1-7, 2019.
20.
S. AbdulRahman, H. Tout, A. Mourad and C. Talhi, "FedMCCS: Multicriteria client selection model for optimal IoT federated learning", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 4723-4735, Mar. 2021.
21.
H. Wang, Z. Kaplan, D. Niu and B. Li, "Optimizing federated learning on non-IID data with reinforcement learning", Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Commun., pp. 1698-1707, 2020.
22.
I. Mohammed et al., "Budgeted Online selection of candidate IoT clients to participate in federated learning", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 5938-5952, Apr. 2021.
23.
Y. Jing et al., "Exploiting UAV for air-ground integrated federated learning: A joint UAV location and resource optimization approach", IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., Feb. 2023.
24.
Q.-V. Pham, M. Le, T. Huynh-The, Z. Han and W.-J. Hwang, "Energy-efficient federated learning over UAV-enabled wireless powered communications", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 4977-4990, May 2022.
25.
Q. V. Do, Q.-V. Pham and W.-J. Hwang, "Deep reinforcement learning for energy-efficient federated learning in UAV-enabled wireless powered networks", IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 99-103, Jan. 2022.
26.
X. Liu, Y. Deng and T. Mahmoodi, "Energy efficient user scheduling for hybrid split and federated learning in wireless UAV networks", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., pp. 1-6, 2022.
27.
T. Zeng, O. Semiari, M. Mozaffari, M. Chen, W. Saad and M. Bennis, "Federated learning in the sky: Joint power allocation and scheduling with UAV swarms", Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., pp. 1-6, 2020.
28.
M. Yahya and S. Maghsudi, "Joint coverage and resource allocation for federated learning in UAV-enabled networks", Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf., pp. 2476-2481, 2022.
29.
Y. Shen, Y. Qu, C. Dong, F. Zhou and Q. Wu, "Joint training and resource allocation optimization for federated learning in UAV swarm", IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2272-2284, Feb. 2023.
30.
H. Zhang and L. Hanzo, "Federated learning assisted multi-UAV networks", IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 14104-14109, Nov. 2020.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.