Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Capture Strategy and Control of Non-cooperative Target Using Space Manipulator with Magnetic Capture Device | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Capture Strategy and Control of Non-cooperative Target Using Space Manipulator with Magnetic Capture Device


Abstract:

In this paper, a space manipulator with a magnetic capture device as the end-effector is designed, and it is used to capture a self-spin target. First of all, a kinematic...Show More

Abstract:

In this paper, a space manipulator with a magnetic capture device as the end-effector is designed, and it is used to capture a self-spin target. First of all, a kinematic equation and a dynamic equation are given, then a target approach strategy for the manipulator combined with fifth-order polynomial interpolation methods for trajectory planning is designed, and then an improved PD algorithm is adopted to achieve the trajectory tracking control. For the magnetic capture device, its suction model is established through experimental fitting, and a capture strategy is set according to its characteristics. Finally, a numerical simulation is designed to prove that the control strategy designed in this paper is reasonable and effective.
Date of Conference: 25-27 November 2022
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 13 March 2023
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Xiamen, China
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

At present, a large number of satellites become non-cooperative targets due to on-orbit failures or ending of tasks [1]. They not only occupy orbit resources, but also threaten other spacecrafts [2]. By the end of 2021, more than 80% of on-orbit satellites in space are low-orbit satellites [3], which is the reason to develop deorbit technology specially for low-orbit satellites. At present, the deorbit technology of low-orbit satellites mainly includes several technical ideas such as drag augmentation system, solar radiation force, electrodynamic tether, contactless removal methods and capture methods [4]. Compared with other deorbit methods, capture deorbit has been noticed for a long time, so there are lots of research concentrate on it, that’s why this deorbit method is more reliable. At present, this technology has been divided into two different branches: flexible connection capture and stiff connection capture [5]. In these two branches, stiff connection capture has been preferred by researchers for its high flexibility and convenience for ground experiment.

Select All
1.
A Ellery, J Kreisel and B Sommer, "The case for robotic on-orbit servicing of spacecraft: spacecraft reliability is a myth[J]", Acta Astronaut, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 632-48, 2008.
2.
Bowen Zhan, Minghe Jin, Guocai Yang and Cheng Zhang, "A novel strategy for space manipulator detumbling a non-cooperative target with collision avoidance[J]", Advances in Space Research, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 785-799, 2020.
3.
Yu Fu, "Global aerospace launch statistical analysis in 2021[J]", Space International, no. 02, pp. 10-14, 2022.
4.
Minghe Shan, Jian Guo and Eberhard Gill, "Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods[J]", Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 18-32, 2015.
5.
Kang Huifeng, Mei Tianyu, Xia Guangqing, Wang Xiaoyang, Fan Yipeng and Lu Chang, "Overview of spacecraft end-of-life deorbiting technology [J/OL]", Chinese space science and technology, pp. 1-13, 07 2022, [online] Available: http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1859.v.20211025.1917.004.html.
6.
Yongjun Sun, Qian Wang, Yiwei Liu, Zongwu Xie, Minghe Jin and Hong Liu, "Review of space non-cooperative target capture methods(in Chinese)[J]", Journal of National University of Defense Technology, vol. 42, no. 03, pp. 73-90, 2020.
7.
Angel Flores-Abad, Ou Ma, Khanh Pham and Steve Ulrich, "A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing[J]", Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1-26, 2014.
8.
D. Henry, J. Cieslak, J. Zenteno Torres, P. Colmenarejo, J. Branco, N. Santos, et al., "Model-based fault diagnosis and tolerant control: the ESA’s e.Deorbit mission[C]", Proc. of 18th European Control Conference ECC, pp. 4356-4361, 2019.
9.
Gerd Hirzinger, Klaus Landzettel, Bernhard Brunner, Max Fischer, Carsten Preusche, Detlef Reintsema, et al., "DLR’s robotics technologies for on orbit servicing[J]", Advanced Robotics, vol. 18, pp. 139-174, 2004.
10.
Cheng Yao, "Capture Control of Space Robot for Non-Cooperative Targets(in Chinese)[D]", Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021.
11.
B. Wie, H. Weiss and A. Arapostathis, "Quaternion Feedback Regulator for Spacecraft Eigenaxis Rotations[J]", Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 374-380, 1989.
12.
Cheng Zhou, "Research on Autonomous Control Strategy of Space Robot for Target Capturing(in Chinese)[D]" in , Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.