I. Introduction
With increasing signal speeds for high speed interfaces on blade and rack servers, signal integrity (SI) evaluation based on eye height (EH), eye width (EW) and bit error rate (BER) testing becomes intensive in compute power, memory and time. For a selected channel topology, there are several variables impacting the signal quality. These variables include controllable variables like trace length, impedance, termination and uncontrollable variables such as process and manufacturing tolerances. Design rules are needed to ensure signal quality is good. In order to come up with design rules, several Time Domain (TD) simulations are needed to cover the design space. State of art existing methods involve statistical or optimization techniques to span over the design space, covering all possible corners. Design of experiments (DoE) is a technique based on generating orthogonal vectors in a multi-dimensional design space to generate a design set that would cover the entire design space. Response surface method (RSM) is used to fit the DoE based designs to predict EH and EW and to perform Monte-Carlo analysis based on RSM analysis [1]. A Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) based Artificial Neural Network (ANN) method to predict EH and EW from channel topology variables, using a DoE to train the network and capture the non-linear dependence of the EH and EW on the variables is presented in [2]. However, from [3], it is also evident that a DoE based approach can sometimes provide an in-accurate sensitivity analysis of EH and EW to certain variables when compared to a full-factorial sweep across all possible design and process variations. Performing TD simulations for full-factorial sweep will take excessive time. However, Frequency Domain (FD) simulations take much less time and can be used to perform full-factorial design sweeps.