Abstract:
Perturbation approaches in terms of a small dimensionless parameter are standard and very useful in field computations. For instance, if the width of an airgap can be con...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
Perturbation approaches in terms of a small dimensionless parameter are standard and very useful in field computations. For instance, if the width of an airgap can be considered "small", no mesh inside the gap will be required. However, it often happens that two such small parameters intervene in the modelling, and "compete" in some way. In such situations, two, very different, limit problems are candidates as simplified formulations, depending on which of the two small parameters is taken as dominant. A justified concern for ease of computation may then involuntarily lead to the selection of a wrong model, so this raises delicate modelling issues. Some methodological guidelines are offered in this respect. The case of the small airgap in a conductor is treated in detail, showing how the penetration depth intrudes in the modelling as a second small parameter, besides the airgap width. Implications as regards numerical schemes, in both main variants where either e or h is the primary unknown, are discussed.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Magnetics ( Volume: 32, Issue: 3, May 1996)
DOI: 10.1109/20.497343
Citations are not available for this document.
Cites in Papers - |
Cites in Papers - IEEE (5)
Select All
1.
Xiaoxin Lu, Yu Liu, Lionel Pichon, Delong He, Olivier Dubrunfaut, Jinbo Bai, "Effective electrical conductivity of CNT/polymer nanocomposites", 2020 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE, pp.1-4, 2020.
2.
Y. Choua, L. Santandrea, Y. Le Bihan, C. Marchand, "Thin Crack Modeling in ECT With Combined Potential Formulations", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol.43, no.4, pp.1789-1792, 2007.
3.
Y. Choua, L. Santandrea, Y. Le Bihan, C. Marchand, "Thin Crack Modeling in ECT with Combined Potential Formulations", 2006 12th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation, pp.498-498, 2006.
4.
Zhuoxiang Ren, "Degenerated Whitney prism elements-general nodal and edge shell elements for field computation in thin structures", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol.34, no.5, pp.2547-2550, 1998.
5.
G. Vinsard, S. Dufour, B. Laporte, "An approximation for the air-slots of complex shaped motors", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol.34, no.5, pp.2449-2452, 1998.
Cites in Papers - Other Publishers (5)
1.
Xiaoxin Lu, Lionel Pichon, Jinbo Bai, "Multiscale modeling and numerical analyses of the electric conductivity of CNT /polymer nanocomposites taking into account the tunneling effect", International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 2021.
2.
Xiaoxin Lu, Anne Zhang, Olivier Dubrunfaut, Delong He, Lionel Pichon, Jinbo Bai, "Numerical modeling and experimental characterization of the AC conductivity and dielectric properties of CNT/polymer nanocomposites", Composites Science and Technology, pp.108150, 2020.
3.
Sarah Cochez-Dhondt, Serge Nicaise, "Robust a posteriori error estimation for the Maxwell equations", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol.196, no.25-28, pp.2583, 2007.
4.
A Portone, G Rubinacci, F Villone, W Zamboni, "Electromagnetic 3D analysis of an ITER full-size cable-in-conduit conductor sample", Superconductor Science and Technology, vol.20, no.10, pp.1032, 2007.
5.
H. De Gersem, K. Hameyer, "Harmonic boundary conditions for circular inclusions and their coupling to external circuits", IEE Proceedings - Science, Measurement and Technology, vol.148, no.6, pp.257-262, 2001.
