Comparative Analysis of Evaluation of the Quality Criteria of Educational Program in Field of Measuring Technology

The paper presents the results of a comparative analysis of the significance of the applied criteria for evaluation of the quality of educational program (EP). The analysis carried out relates to a group expert evaluation of the significance of the criteria and their sub-criteria for the EP in the field of measuring technology. A group expert evaluation was carried out by professors and the most qualified specialists of the Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iaşi(Romania) and several Ukrainian universities specializing in the field of measuring technology. For the evaluation, the same criteria and sub-criteria were used, as well as the same algorithm for processing the results. The received priorities of criteria and sub-criteria for two evaluations are analyzed. The criteria and sub-criteria that are important for the EP, established by two evaluations, are highlighted. Similarly, criteria and sub-criteria are highlighted that are not of significant importance for the EP, also identified by the two evaluations.

I. Introduction

The International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) was developed by UNESCO and covers a methodology for evaluating national education systems. The classification of educational programs (EP) as main unit of the ISCED is carried out according to fields of knowledge, orientation and purpose of EP [1].