I. Introduction and Background
Ever since the frequency response analysis (FRA or SFRA) was introduced for transformer diagnostics in late ’70s [1]–[3], several responses like line current, neutral current, transferred surge, neutral-end voltages have been explored and analyzed to examine their sensitivity to detect the mechanical changes in transformer winding [4]–[8]. Even to increase the sensitivity of FRA measurement several investigations are reported in the literature to identify the best terminal configuration for the tested and non-tested windings [9]–[15], but surprisingly, the tank current response was never explored for FRA diagnostics. Therefore, the author recently started an investigation to know whether the tank current measurement could be of any use for fault diagnostics in transformer winding [16]. Investigation was initially limited to explore the measurement sensitivity of tank current to identify a fault in single isolated transformer winding. Tank current response actually happens to be the current to the tank through ground capacitances of the winding and its contributions are distributed throughout the length of the winding. Therefore, it intuitively seems that it may contain identical winding related information similar to any other measured response of the winding. Intuition was also proven correct by the investigation in [16]. Once a fault was introduced in isolated winding, tank current measurement exhibited new resonance peaks in subsequently measured frequency response and also identified the change/shift in magnitude and position of the existing peaks and troughs. The second aspect is the most common for all FRA measurements and is also employed for measuring the fault detection sensitivity in conventional method. But, the first-one i.e. the occurrence of new resonance peaks is found very unique for tank current magnitude response. This feature enables the tank current measurement to identify a fault in isolated transformer winding simply by observing new resonance peaks in subsequently measured frequency response as compared to the peaks in healthy response. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, similar study is never reported in published literature to assess the sensitivity of tank current measurement for fault identification in three-phase transformer. Therefore, in such a scenario, it is imperative to investigate the resonance behaviour of tank current for three-phase transformer and to examine its potential for fault diagnostics.