I. Introduction
Terrain data are important data sources for various applications, including hydrology [1] and landslide modeling [2]. Terrain elevation data are acquired from various sources, such as topographic maps and remote measurements, which are often stored as digital elevation models (DEMs). Generally, there are three types of elevation data: point DEMs, grid DEMs, and digitized isolines. Numerous methods have been proposed for DEM interpolation to derive high-quality DEM data, including nearest neighbor [3], bilinear [4], cubic convolution [5], spline methods [6], inverse distance weighting [7], Thiessen polygons [8], and geostatistical interpolators [9], [10]. However, interpolating DEM data from a single source cannot always achieve the standard for DEM products because it may not be possible to enhance the accuracy of a DEM dataset (with a specific resolution) merely by interpolation due to the loss of subpixel (grid cell) information in the original data sampling, which cannot be recovered by interpolation. With the rapid growth of multisource geospatial information, data are usually obtained at different spatial resolutions with different accuracies. Spatial data fusion seeks to generate new datasets, which are meant to have increased accuracy, properly refined spatial resolution, or enhanced applicability and utility, from multisource data that are complementary in terms of sampling density, resolution, and accuracy. As a result, the new datasets will collectively be more informative or useful than an individual source dataset alone. In particular, there seems to be merit in the integration of multisource spatial data for improved quality in terms of accuracy and/or resolution. Here, we consider the terms integration, conflation, and fusion as being synonymous, acknowledging that fusion is the most frequently used term. Data fusion has been widely used in geographical information systems, with the aim of synergizing geospatial information from different sources. A review and comparison of all the fusion methods are beyond the scope of this paper. In this study, we only focus on the fusion methods needed to achieve data refinement. Although elevation data with low spatial resolution are easily available (e.g., GTOPO30 and GMTED2010), it is an expensive and time-consuming process to obtain elevation data with high spatial resolution over a large area (e.g., LiDAR) [11], [12]. Data refinement of DEMs can be accomplished by the fusion of two or more data sets. It has been suggested that data integration can refine the spatial resolution (i.e., downscale) [13] or increase the accuracy of DEMs [14], and it can provide a solution to the accuracy assessment [15].