I. Introduction
Stable tracking control under the effect of noise is a prerequisite for most of the industrial robotic applications. Broadly, the tracking is implemented using both controllers and observers. The estimation by observers is widely done via filtering methods and model estimation mechanisms. For example, the Kalman filter, extended Kalman filter (EKF), unscented Kalman filter (UKF), and particle filter form filter-based methods, whereas, unknown input observer in disturbance accommodation control, disturbance observer, perturbation observer, extended state observer, equivalent input disturbance based estimator and uncertainty and disturbance estimator are some user-defined model-based observers [1]–[3]. The superiority of filter-based observers is proven because they are considered a part of the state variable of the nonlinear system, which results in high robustness compared to the other observers. Moreover, the derivative of the state in the model-based observer is always spiky, whereas, in filter-based observers, the inherent frequency smoothing is present. Although the observers have been mainly used to estimate the disturbances. After estimation, the control actions are applied to minimize the error between variables of interest. It should be noted that if the disturbance is known, it is a straightforward strategy to eliminate disturbance using the feedforward mechanism. However, it is not directly measurable and is a costly affair to measure it due to the use of various sensors for measurement. Furthermore, EKF is widely used in such applications where the disturbances are nonmeasurable. The EKF is applied to linearized dynamics of the system, assuming that the disturbance and unmodeled forces are Gaussian [27]. However, in stochastic nonlinear systems, the first-order linearization dilutes the effect of nonlinear action on the system during the modeling of the EKF recursive equations. To overcome this disadvantage of EKF, Sigma points EKF (SEKF) had been proposed, where the implementation of SEKF is far easier because there is no Jacobian calculation involved [5], [6]. However, in SEKF, weights are assigned to a large number of samples, which according to the central limit theorem (CLT), is an approximation to the normal distribution and hence deviates from the Gaussian distribution. On the other hand, in UKF, the sample points are propagated through the true nonlinear system, which in fact converges to true mean and covariance of the Gaussian variable in view of the strong law of large numbers. The linearized implementation of the UKF while retaining the true nonlinearity of the system is still underdeveloped and will be investigated.