Moving Object Localization based on the Fusion of Ultra-WideBand and LiDAR with a Mobile Robot

Localization of objects is vital for robot-object interaction. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) application in robotics is an emerging and widely used object localization technique due to its accurate distance measurement, long-range, wide field of view, and robustness in different conditions. However, LiDAR is unable to identify the objects when they are obstructed by obstacles, resulting in inaccuracy and noise in localization. To address this issue, we present an approach incorporating LiDAR and Ultra-Wideband (UWB) ranging for object localization. The UWB is popular in sensor fusion localization algorithms due to its low weight and low power consumption. In addition, the UWB is able to return ranging measurements even when the object is not within line-of-sight. Our approach provides an efficient solution to combine an anonymous optical sensor (LiDAR) with an identity-based radio sensor (UWB) to improve the localization accuracy of the object. Our approach consists of three modules. The first module is an object-identification algorithm that compares successive scans from the LiDAR to detect a moving object in the environment and returns the position with the closest range to UWB ranging. The second module estimates the moving object’s moving direction using the previous and current estimated position from our object-identification module. It removes the suspicious estimations through an outlier rejection criterion. Lastly, we fuse the LiDAR, UWB ranging, and odometry measurements in pose graph optimization (PGO) to recover the entire trajectory of the robot and object. For a static robot and a moving object scenario, we show in experiments that the proposed approach improves the average relative translational and rotational accuracy by 44% and 31.6%, respectively, compared to the conventional UWB ranging localization. Additionally, we extend the approach to a moving robot and a moving object scenario and show that our approach improves the average relative translation and rotational accuracy by 13.5% and 36%, respectively.