I. Introduction
Given a social or computer network, where the links represent who has the potential to infect whom, what can we say about its epidemic threshold? That is, can we determine whether a small infection can ‘take-off’ and create an epidemic? What will change if the nodes have permanent, temporary or no immunity? Both the underlying contact-network (or the population structure) and the particular cascade (propagation) model should intuitively play an important role in the spread of contagions (viruses/memes/products). Finding the epidemic threshold for an arbitrary network is an important and fundamental question in epidemiology and related areas. For instance, Figure 1 shows the simulation output after running the SIRS model (Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered-Susceptible which models diseases with temporary immunity like pertussis) on a large contact-network for different values of the virulence of the virus (achieved by tuning the parameters of the model). We can clearly see two different regimes - the fast die-out green regime and the steady-state epidemic red regime. Our paper deals with finding the condition which separates these two regimes in SIRS, as well as in all other virus propagation models in standard literature [20], [12], on arbitrary contact-networks. Qualitatively different infection time-series curves (Fraction of Infected population vs Time) for the SIRS model (temporary immunity, like pertussis) on a large contact-network. What is the condition that separates the two regimes - red (epidemic) vs green (extinction)?